Emotionshock Gossip for all the latest Celebrity Gossip
Posted by emotionshock on July 11, 2011 under Celebrity Gossip | 
Be the First to Comment
Like it or not, Rebecca Black is back.
You may love her, you may hate her (you’re probably just really, really annoyed by her) but the 14-year-old “Friday” perpetrator is…
View full post on E! Online (US) – Top Stories
Posted by emotionshock on February 15, 2011 under Celebrity Gossip | Be the First to Comment
Thank you, Glee. And thank you, Justin Bieber. “Baby” will be stuck in our head for days.
Luckily, we have a plan that will maybe definitely work to get rid of that earworm….
View full post on E! Online (US) – Top Stories
Posted by emotionshock on July 7, 2010 under Celebrity Gossip | Be the First to Comment
Sitting in on an OK! Magazine staff meeting would be so awesome.
There’s an element to celebrity gossip that is always, well, gossip. You take what you read with a grain of salt. But there’s gossip, and there’s deliberately and wholly inventing cover stories, misleading readers with vague text and exclamation points.
Guess Jessica Simpson’s name came up in the lottery this week, or the darts landed on her, because she’s apparently having a baby! Would you believe that the same story was reported almost verbatim last week, only about Jennifer Aniston?
It’s true! Doubly joyful news!
CONFIRMED: OK! wrote a cover story! Consider it REVEALED!
According to this fine publication, as Jessica nears her 30th birthday this week, she has a new man (Eric Johnson) and a new plan – to become a mother!
The first part of that is true, at least. But then there’s this line:
“Enjoying an early birthday celebration at the Greenbrier Casino Club gala opening in West Virginia on July 4, Jess caused a stir with her visible bump!”
No word if they mean a visible bump on her head or knee.
Seriously, time to get a little more creative with your made-up nonsense, guys. You’re going to be labeled the magazine that cried fake-pregnant wolf.
View full post on The Hollywood Gossip
Posted by emotionshock on June 22, 2010 under Celebrity Gossip | Be the First to Comment
If you think a photo shoot with Lindsay Lohan nude except for a SCRAM alcohol monitor on her ankle sounds too good to be true … you should get out more.
But it might happen!
Not that it’s a rare sight. Remember the gun-toting Cinemax-style shoot in April? Exactly. But Lohan is set to strip down to ankle monitor only next month.
The former actress and current train wreck is ready to take it all off yet again for the cameras – ankle monitor or not – to promote her 6126 line of handbags.
According to L.A. Magazine, Richard Luna of The California Bag (which licenses the 6126 totes) confirmed a new campaign will feature Lindsay Lohan nude.
Lindsay Lohan is about to make her clothes SCRAM!
Talk about hot. Although there is a contingency plan in place.
Luna said that if the SCRAM bracelet became a hindrance: “We’re thinking of having police on hand so we can remove the ankle bracelet for the pictures.”
Only in Hollywood. Can you imagine that scene? Police dispatched to remove, then reapply the bracelet after the shoot? Funniest LAPD assignment ever.
There is also talk of Lindsay Lohan pictures taken with the alcohol-monitoring device, only to have the court-mandated accessory airbrushed out later on.
Hitting department stores this fall, the 6126 (named after Marilyn Monroe’s birthdate) handbags retail for $200-600. A cheaper, sister line, 7286 (Lohan’s birth date), will be available for under $200 at lower-end stores such as Macy’s.
They should just call it 420 … or 5150.
View full post on The Hollywood Gossip